Testifying: Carol Anne Perez, Executive
Director (Respectfully Submitted on
Organization: FacioScapuloHumeral Society, Incorporated (FSH Society, Inc.)
Subcommittee:
Regarding: Fiscal
Year 2005 Appropriations Subcommittee Hearing on Labor,
Research
Programs on Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy and Muscular Dystrophy.
STATEMENT
OF CAROL ANNE PEREZ, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FACIOSCAPULOHUMERAL
SOCIETY (THE FSH SOCIETY) BEFORE THE
UNITED
STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, SUBCOMMITTEE ON
LABOR,
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND EDUCATION AND RELATED AGENCIES
REGARDING
FISCAL YEAR 2005 APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE NIH
FOR RESEARCH
ON FACIOSCAPULOHUMERAL MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY (FSHD)
Mr. Chairman, it is a great pleasure to submit this
testimony to you today.
My name is Carol Anne Perez, of
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is the
third most prevalent form of muscle disease.
FSHD is a neuromuscular disorder that is transmitted genetically to
1/20,000 people. Conservatively, it
affects 14,000 persons in the
In accordance with its primary purpose of serving the
FSHD community, both in the United States and abroad, the
People who have FSHD must cope with continuing,
unrelenting, unpredictable and never-ending losses. The most unlucky, those who are affected from
birth, are deprived of virtually all the ordinary joys
and pleasures of childhood and adolescence.
But no matter at which stage of life the disease makes itself known, there
is never after that any reprieve from continuing loss of physical ability, or
ever for a moment relief from the physical and emotional pain that FSHD brings
in its train. Every morning, FSHD
sufferers wake up to face the reality that neither a cause for their disease
nor any treatment for it has yet been found.
Insidiously and systematically, FSHD denies a person
the full range of choices in life. FSHD
affects the way you walk, the way you dress, the way you work, the way you
wash, the way you sleep, the way you relate, the way you parent, the way you
love, the way and where you live, and the way people perceive and treat
you. You cannot smile, hold a baby in
your arms, close your eyes to sleep, run, walk on the
beach, or climb stairs. Each new day
brings renewed awareness of the things you may not be able to do the next
day. This is what life is for tens of
thousands of people affected by FSHD worldwide.
Through the
The Appropriations Committees in both the U.S. House
and the U.S. Senate have repeatedly instructed the National Institutes of Health
(NIH) to enhance and broaden the portfolio in FSHD and muscular dystrophy in
general. The NIH accounting for the
total overall NIH and the subset of muscular dystrophy appropriations in
millions of dollars for the past five years follows:
National Institutes of Health (NIH) Appropriations History
Source: NIH/OD Budget Office
& NIH CRISP Database On-line
(Dollars in millions)
Fiscal NIH Overall MD Research MD
% FSH Research FSHD % FSHD
%
Year Dollars Dollars of NIH Dollars of
MD of NIH
2000 $17,821M $12.6M 0.071% $0.4M 3.18% 0.0022%
2001 $20,458M $21.0M 0.103% $0.5M 2.38% 0.0024%
2002 $23,296M $27.6M 0.118% $1.3M 4.71% 0.0056%
2003 $27,067M $39.1M 0.144% $1.5M 3.83% 0.0055%
2004E $27,887M $40.2M 0.144% $2.7M 6.71% 0.0097%
Due to major initiatives from the volunteer health
agencies and the extramural community of researchers, FSHD research at the NIH and
funding through the NIH is moving ahead at a steady pace though seemingly
incredibly slow for those of us suffering from FSHD. Notwithstanding these positive changes at the
NIH as well as major cooperative initiatives from the volunteer health agencies
and the extramural community of researchers, we realize that major changes are
slow but we are hopeful that this year the NIH will initiate new and increased
funding for FSHD.
Funding increases for FSHD as related to the entire muscular dystrophy portfolio are not keeping pace with all muscular dystrophy. FSHD is the third most prevalent form of muscle disease and a common muscular dystrophy. Yet, in 2003 it received only 3.83 percent of the total NIH wide muscular dystrophy portfolio and that number has improved slightly to an estimated 6.71 percent for fiscal year 2004.
Mr. Chairman, as you know, the National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), the National Institute of Arthritis
and Musculoskeletal Disorders (NIAMS), and, the National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) are three of the National Institutes
of Health (NIH) institutes called upon by the Muscular Dystrophy Community
Assistance Research and Education Act of 2001 (MD
National Institutes of Health (NIH) Muscular Dystrophy and FSHD Appropriations
History
Source: NIH/OD Budget Office
& NIH CRISP Database On-line
(Dollars in millions)
Fiscal Total NIH NIAMS
NINDS
NICHD
NIH
wide
Year Dollars on MD Dollars on MD Dollars
on MD Dollars on MD Dollars on FSHD
2000 $12.6M $4.8M $4.9M $1.2M $0.4M
2001 $21.0M $9.2M $8.2M $0.5M $0.5M
2002 $27.6M $11.1M $9.8M $0.6M $1.3M
2003 $39.1M $15.5M $13.2M $4.5M $1.5M
2004E $40.2M $15.9M $13.5M $4.7M $2.7M
2005E $41.0M $16.3M $13.7M $4.8M $2.8M
In fiscal year 2004 year-to-date, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) does not have a single research grant or project directly focused or covering FSHD. NICHD is spending $0 out of an estimated $4.7M on directly titled FSHD projects. NICHD is spending 0 percent of its muscular dystrophy budget on FSHD.
In fiscal year 2004 year-to-date, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders (NIAMS) is funding two directly titled projects on FSHD and the NIH FSHD Research Patient Registry. The directly titled grants and contracts are 5-R21-AR-48318-03 at $198,000, 5-R21-AR-48327-03 at $125,000, and, 3-N01-AR-02250-004 $175,754. Directly focused and titled research grants on FSHD actually decreased in FY2004 due to the expiration of a third R21 and no new directly titled and relevant projects being funded. No new projects directly titled and focused on FSHD have been initiated in the past three years. Not a single one. The total direct expenditure from the lead institute on FSHD muscular dystrophy, the NIAMS, was $498,754. The NIAMS is spending 3.1 percent of its total muscular dystrophy budget on FSHD. Something is definitely and clearly wrong with this picture.
In
fiscal year 2004 year-to-date, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders
and Stroke (NINDS) is funding seven directly titled projects on FSHD and the
NIH U54 Cooperative Research Center at the
While it is recognized that research grants, grant applications and interest of the researchers may ebb and flow, we are seriously concerned and perplexed with the total lack of presence by the NICHD in FSHD and weak showing of FSHD grants and the dip in direct FSHD support by the NIAMS, ostensibly the lead institute at the NIH, on muscular dystrophy. FSHD is the third most prevalent form of muscular dystrophy and the NIAMS has 3.1 percent of its dystrophy portfolio allocated to this disease. In the case made that the NIH is not receiving enough grants applications for FSHD, it can be said that the volunteer health agencies and extramural community of researchers have done everything in our power to grow the area of research and to promote new researchers and research projects. The NIH needs to recognize that there is a systemic problem as relates to FSHD and that the extramural research community needs to know that there are specific grant mechanisms and announcements with money associated.
The NINDS, NIAMS, NICHD and relevant NIH institutes understand that FSHD is a unique disease and that there are exciting breakthroughs around understanding the molecular basis of FSHD. Elucidation of the molecular pathogenic pathways of the FSHD disease is instrumental to improved patient diagnosis, counseling, management and treatment. It is now generally accepted that FSHD is caused by a deletion (contraction) of D4Z4 repeats on the chromosome 4q. New mutations are frequently encountered and approximately half of cases seem to be due to somatic rearrangements. An interesting gender difference in disease expression in mosaic patients – males are more susceptible to disease - suggest a hormonal modulation of the phenotype. FSHD is associated with a genomic rearrangement and it is unlikely that the D4Z4 deletion structurally compromises a putative FSHD gene. Evidence strongly supports a model in which the D4Z4 contraction induces a change in the chromosomal environment, more specifically the chromatin structure, which in its turn modulates the gene expression of gene(s) in cis or in trans. This may occur by a spreading or looping mechanism, or more speculatively, by a mechanism similar to transvection as chromosome ends of 4q and 10q seem to exhibit a higher pairing frequency and other forms of cross talk. However, identification of the exact molecular mechanism and the crucial target gene(s) has still to be done. There is increasing evidence for FSHD-specific changes in the chromatin structure and the histone code. Most arguments suggest a unique (novel) pathogenic mechanism behind FSHD. Elucidation of this intricate molecular network is instrumental to the development of evidence-based treatment (and preventive) strategies.
The following is a non-exhaustive list of top priority research targets and areas for investigation that has been given by FSHD research experts to the NIH for consideration as the NIH research plan is developed. The order is not intended to indicate priority rating. 1.) Detailed characterization of individual candidate genes on chromosome 4q; 2.) Identification of the difference between 4qA and 4qB; only short 4qA is causing FSHD; 3.) The molecular causes and consequences of the exchange between 4q and 10q; 4.) Chromatin structure and nuclear organization – histone code; methylation, acetylation etc.; 5.) Establishment of the gene expression modulation on chromosome 4q and genome-wide; 6.) Development of functional models in vitro (cellular) and in vivo (transgenic); 7.) Implementation of systems biology (integrated –omics and bioinformatics) to reveal molecular and metabolic pathways involved; 8.) Harmonize and standardize molecular diagnostic procedures; 9.) Systematic ascertainment and characterization of (homogenous) patient populations for clinical trials; 10.) Generation of tools and reagents to monitor (pharmacological, training, or gene therapy) interventions; 11.) Identification of additional FSHD loci and genes.
Congress has been very generous with the NIH. Congress has repeatedly mandated more effort
in muscular dystrophy research in general and FSHD research in particular. But this is not happening. We ask Congress to continue its support for
the overall budget increases for the NIH as this will alleviate the serious
budget constraints faced by this most remarkable federal agency. We also ask that Congress request an
explanation from the program staff and Directors of the NIH NIAMS and NICHD for
the inability to do better in the area of FSHD despite repeated Congressional
requests. We implore Congress to request
the NIH to specifically build the research portfolio on FSHD through all
available means, including re-issuing specific calls for research on FSHD at an
accelerated rate, to make up for historical and present neglect.
Mr. Chairman, we trust your judgment on the matter
before us. We believe the Committee
should explore why muscular dystrophy in general and FSHD in particular has
been left behind in the great rise in research support at the NIH. Frankly, we are extremely frustrated that
amid a huge increase in funding and strong unambiguous expressions of
Congressional support, the NIH commitment in facioscapulohumeral muscular
dystrophy (FSHD) is so feeble. Mr.
Chairman thanks to your extraordinary efforts, consideration and work in this
area I have hope that we will find solutions and that hope keeps me going.
Mr. Chairman, again, thank
you for providing this opportunity to testify before your Subcommittee.